Civ
Pro 2 Notes
We
left off discussing compliance. We could
go over a lot of different problems, but the important stuff is that you need
to look at both Rule 37 and Rule
26(c) and (g). Is it better
strategically to seek protective orders to prevent having to answer discovery,
or is it better to object and wait for the other side to file motions to compel
and then raise the same issues you would raise in a protective order? Yeazell says that it’s better not to rush for
the protective order. You might be able
to defuse a discovery dispute that will be enflamed by filing a protective
order motion. (But to
whose advantage is such strategy?
The client?
The attorney?
“Justice?”)
Discovery and privacy – Stalnaker v. Kmart Corp.
This
is a “fair employment practices” case.
But it wasn’t reported in the Federal Supplement. It’s a run-of-the-mill case. What has Ms. Stalnaker
done? She has sued
Under
this order, what questions can be asked?
How can you phrase a question about sexual activity with
Can
the magistrate judge’s order be appealed?
The discovery order isn’t dispositive of anything except what’s before
you. So generally, there will be no
appellate review of this kind of discovery dispute. But the statute that creates the magistrate judge’s
jurisdiction does have an out for interlocutory review of matters that are “clearly
erroneous”. If the magistrate makes a
really bad mistake, you can ask the district court to review and reverse that
mistake.