Constitutional Law Class Notes 3/3/04

 

I lost all my notes halfway through class and I can’t get them back.  Whatever stupid thing I did, don’t do it.

 

It was supposed to be:

 

More on Cheney

 

And

 

The political question doctrine

 

The entire universe of constitutional questions include those questions subject to the Marbury power and those that the Court doesn’t control.  The political question doctrine includes all those constitutional interpretation questions that the Court will refuse to answer because it doesn’t think it can.  Marbury and the political question doctrine are the opposite of each other.

 

The Tenth Amendment used to fall under the political question doctrine.  Now it’s back under Marbury.

 

Why isn’t Padilla a case where the political question doctrine should apply?  Foreign affairs is an area where the political question doctrine is frequently invoked.  But this doctrine was never mentioned in Padilla!  How come?

 

The Vietnam War was a key example where the courts said that the war was a political question.  People wanted the courts to say that Vietnam was an illegal war.  But the courts wouldn’t touch it!  That’s not to say that sending troops to Vietnam wasn’t a very important issue.  So how important a question is cannot be determinative of whether it’s a political question or not.

 

Is it a power issue?

 

In Padilla, the court was deciding both a power question and a rights question.  Neither one was considered a political question that didn’t belong to the court.

 

Foley thinks that questions will be decided if they involve the rights of individual people.  The answer to certain power questions affects actual litigants and not just the relationship between different branches of government.  The court will be more likely to think about a question as a political question when the only parties in the dispute are branches of government themselves.

 

Back to Class Notes