Dawson, pp. 456-511: The Effects of Adopting a Writing


Introductory Note



Case: Mitchill v. Lath


          Note: Believability and “Naturalness”



Case: Hatley v. Stafford


          Case: Hayden v. Hoadley (excerpt)


          Restatement of Contracts, Second §§ 209, 213, 214, 216


          Case: Interform Co. v. Mitchell (excerpt)


          Comment: The UCC’s Parol Evidence Rule


Case: Luris Bros. & Co. v. Pielet Bros. Scrap Iron & Metal, Inc. (excerpt)



Case: Lipsit v. Leonard


Case: Bank of America Nat. Trust & Sav. Ass’n v. Pendergrass (excerpt)


Note: Confining Promissory Fraud


Case: Sabo v. Delman (excerpt)



Case: LaFazia v. Howe


          Note: Contractual Exclusion of Fraud


          Case: Rio Grande Jewelers Supply v. Data General Corp. (excerpt)



Case: Hoffman v. Chapman


          Interpretation of Written Agreements


          Case: Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Turner Constr. Co. (excerpt)


          Case: Robert Indus. v. Spence (excerpt)



Case: Pacific Gas & Elec. Co. v. G.W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.


          Case: Federal Dep. Ins. Corp. v. W.R. Grace & Co. (excerpt)


          Case: Spaulding v. Morse (excerpt)


          Restatement of Contracts, Second § 212


          The Parol Evidence Rule and the Statute of Frauds



Back to Casebook Notes