Dawson, pp. 456-511: The Effects of Adopting a Writing

 

Introductory Note

 

 

Case: Mitchill v. Lath

 

          Note: Believability and “Naturalness”

 

 

Case: Hatley v. Stafford

 

          Case: Hayden v. Hoadley (excerpt)

 

          Restatement of Contracts, Second §§ 209, 213, 214, 216

 

          Case: Interform Co. v. Mitchell (excerpt)

 

          Comment: The UCC’s Parol Evidence Rule

 

Case: Luris Bros. & Co. v. Pielet Bros. Scrap Iron & Metal, Inc. (excerpt)

 

 

Case: Lipsit v. Leonard

 

Case: Bank of America Nat. Trust & Sav. Ass’n v. Pendergrass (excerpt)

 

Note: Confining Promissory Fraud

 

Case: Sabo v. Delman (excerpt)

 

 

Case: LaFazia v. Howe

 

          Note: Contractual Exclusion of Fraud

 

          Case: Rio Grande Jewelers Supply v. Data General Corp. (excerpt)

 

 

Case: Hoffman v. Chapman

 

          Interpretation of Written Agreements

 

          Case: Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Turner Constr. Co. (excerpt)

 

          Case: Robert Indus. v. Spence (excerpt)

 

 

Case: Pacific Gas & Elec. Co. v. G.W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.

 

          Case: Federal Dep. Ins. Corp. v. W.R. Grace & Co. (excerpt)

 

          Case: Spaulding v. Morse (excerpt)

 

          Restatement of Contracts, Second § 212

 

          The Parol Evidence Rule and the Statute of Frauds

 

 

Back to Casebook Notes