Van Wagner Advertising Corp. v. S & M Enterprises

Court of Appeals of New York, 1986.

67 N.Y.2d 186, 501 N.Y.S.2d 628, 492 N.E.2d 756.

Dawson, pp. 151-155

 

Facts: The plaintiff leased space on a building to put up a billboard in a very desirable location.  The building was bought by the defendant, who terminated the lease.  The plaintiff sued for specific performance and damages.

 

Issue: Shall the plaintiff receive monetary damages or specific performance?

 

Rule: Specific performance is a possible remedy in cases involving real property or unique items.

 

Analysis: The court says that the contract was not made over real property per se, but rather over a commercial lease.  The leased property was found by the trial court to be unique, but this court holds that this isn’t sufficient to allow the remedy of specific performance.

 

Conclusion: The court held that the plaintiff was entitled to money damages but not specific performance.

 

Back to Enforcement in Equity

Back to Casebook Notes