Yeazell,
pp. 798-834: Claim Preclusion
1.
Precluding
the “Same” Claim
a.
Efficiency
(including Frier v. City of Vandalia)
b.
Consistency
– The Logical Implications of the Former Judgment (including Martino v. McDonald’s System, Inc.)
2.
Between
the “Same” Parties (including Searle
Brothers v. Searle)
3. After a Final Judgment
4. After a Judgment “on the Merits”